<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FuzzyDates, or: One Django Model Field, multiple database columns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.elsdoerfer.name/2008/01/08/fuzzydates-or-one-django-model-field-multiple-database-columns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.elsdoerfer.name/2008/01/08/fuzzydates-or-one-django-model-field-multiple-database-columns/</link>
	<description>Contributing back to the Google Index.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 12:11:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bohdan</title>
		<link>http://blog.elsdoerfer.name/2008/01/08/fuzzydates-or-one-django-model-field-multiple-database-columns/comment-page-1/#comment-2276</link>
		<dc:creator>Bohdan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.elsdoerfer.info/2008/01/08/fuzzydates-or-one-django-model-field-multiple-database-columns/#comment-2276</guid>
		<description>Thanks! Have you tried using it with dmigrations, django_evolution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! Have you tried using it with dmigrations, django_evolution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Virabyan</title>
		<link>http://blog.elsdoerfer.name/2008/01/08/fuzzydates-or-one-django-model-field-multiple-database-columns/comment-page-1/#comment-1636</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Virabyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.elsdoerfer.info/2008/01/08/fuzzydates-or-one-django-model-field-multiple-database-columns/#comment-1636</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much, I was going to implement the exactly same thing, but you saved my time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much, I was going to implement the exactly same thing, but you saved my time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://blog.elsdoerfer.name/2008/01/08/fuzzydates-or-one-django-model-field-multiple-database-columns/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.elsdoerfer.info/2008/01/08/fuzzydates-or-one-django-model-field-multiple-database-columns/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, Malcolm.

I haven&#039;t looked at generic relations at all so far, which is something I know regret. I wasn&#039;t aware that they need to deal with the same issue. I&#039;ll check them out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Malcolm.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t looked at generic relations at all so far, which is something I know regret. I wasn&#8217;t aware that they need to deal with the same issue. I&#8217;ll check them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Tredinnick</title>
		<link>http://blog.elsdoerfer.name/2008/01/08/fuzzydates-or-one-django-model-field-multiple-database-columns/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Tredinnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.elsdoerfer.info/2008/01/08/fuzzydates-or-one-django-model-field-multiple-database-columns/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Well done. This is a very logical approach. The SubfieldBase metaclass is just a helper class for the common case; it&#039;s not required to use it and people *should* just write their own __get__ and __set__ methods when they need to, as you&#039;ve done.

Making this work in the fully general case (where lookups work) is actually pretty fiddly. I&#039;ve been working on a design for a couple of weeks now without having anything brilliant pop out (although it seems to be getting closer). So it&#039;s work in progress. We need it for reverse-lookups with generic relations for example -- which map two database columns to one model attribute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done. This is a very logical approach. The SubfieldBase metaclass is just a helper class for the common case; it&#8217;s not required to use it and people *should* just write their own __get__ and __set__ methods when they need to, as you&#8217;ve done.</p>
<p>Making this work in the fully general case (where lookups work) is actually pretty fiddly. I&#8217;ve been working on a design for a couple of weeks now without having anything brilliant pop out (although it seems to be getting closer). So it&#8217;s work in progress. We need it for reverse-lookups with generic relations for example &#8212; which map two database columns to one model attribute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

